Jul 21 2008

Not So Settled Science

Tag: global whining, religion, scienceSteve @ 14:22 pm

What is up with all the scientists who simply refuse to kowtow to their global warming overlords?  Don’t they realize they could be ex-communicated from AlGore’s Church of Global Warmenism?

50,000 new Deniers :  The American Physical Society, an organization representing nearly 50,000 physicists, has reversed its stance on climate change and is now proclaiming that many of its members disbelieve in human-induced global warming. The APS is also sponsoring public debate on the validity of global warming science. The leadership of the society had previously called the evidence for global warming “incontrovertible.”

In a posting to the APS forum, editor Jeffrey Marque explains,”There is a considerable presence within the scientific community of people who do not agree with the IPCC conclusion that anthropogenic CO2 emissions are very probably likely to be primarily responsible for global warming that has occurred since the Industrial Revolution.”

The APS is opening its debate with the publication of a paper by Lord Monckton of Brenchley, which concludes that climate sensitivity — the rate of temperature change a given amount of greenhouse gas will cause — has been grossly overstated by IPCC modeling. A low sensitivity implies additional atmospheric CO2 will have little effect on global climate.

(HT: Small Dead Animals )

Tags: , , ,


Jun 10 2008

Science and Creation Podcast

Tag: creation, faith, scienceSteve @ 09:01 am

sciencenews podcast If you’re into the science of creation, Reasons.org has a great semi-weekly podcast called Science News Flash , available for free subscription through iTunes.  Each episode is anywhere from 5-17 minutes long and deals with a science topic that’s been in the news from a Biblical perspective.  Recent topics include everything from tectonic plates and earthquakes to the reason men have breasts.

Young-earth creationists tend to dislike Reasons because the ministry takes an old-earth view of creation (e.g., the cosmos was created 13+ billion years ago) while demonstrating the unity of special revelation (Scripture) and general revelation (creation).  YEC-ers tend to disdain the general revelation as somehow being inferior.  I have a problem with that approach because nothing God does is inferior.

The podcasts are great for listening in the car.  With each episode I am more amazed at the God’s creative brilliance and how clearly His fingerprint shows in His creation.

Tags: , , , , , ,


May 06 2008

Chaiten Volcano Eruption

Tag: news and politics, scienceSteve @ 15:32 pm

Things are heating up in southern Chile as the Chaiten volcano continues to erupt. More than 1500 have been evacuated from at-risk areas and ash was blasted 12 miles into the sky. UK Telegraph has some amazing pics and Watt’s Up has video. Here are a few pics:

(If Slideshow link doesn’t work, click on an image.)

(Photos: AFP/Getty )

Tags: , ,


Apr 14 2008

What Do Young-Earth Creationists Do With Mammoths?

Tag: faith, scienceSteve @ 11:18 am

baby mammoth Scribal Terror has a short piece on the discovery of a pristine baby woolly-mammoth carcass.  From a National Geographic report:

A Russian hunter traipsing through Russia’s remote Arctic Yamalo-Nenetsk region in May [2007] noticed what he thought was a reindeer carcass sticking out of the damp snow.  . . .

On closer inspection, the “reindeer” turned out to be a 40,000-year-old baby mammoth, perfectly encased in ice.

The six-month-old female mammoth [nicknamed 'Lyuba' after the hunter's wife, which may not be a compliment] is the most well-preserved example yet found of the beasts, which lumbered across the Earth during the last Ice Age, 1.8 million to 11,500 years ago.

“It’s a lovely little baby mammoth indeed, found in perfect condition,” Alexei Tikhonov, deputy director of the Russian Academy of Science’s Zoological Institute, told the Reuters news agency.

So how did the critter come to be ‘perfectly encased in ice’ 40,000 years ago?  How do you respond to this from a young-earth-creationist perspective?  Did Lyuba fall off the ark?  What do you do with those pesky ice ages that show up periodically in the natural record?  On which creation day did the ice ages (plural) occur?

The natural record can’t conflict with Scripture, it can only conflict with our interpretation of it.  Trying to shoehorn wooly mammoths (or dinosaurs for that matter) and multiple ice ages into a YEC interpretation of the creation account gets interesting, to say the least.

Tags: , , , , ,


Mar 27 2008

Arguing About Stars

Tag: faith, science, spaceSteve @ 13:38 pm
“Like all sciences, astronomy advances most rapidly when confronted with exceptions to its theories…”   ( An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics, Bradley Carroll & Dale Ostlie)

“By the word of the LORD were the heavens made, their starry host by the breath of his mouth.”  ( Psalm 33:6, NIV )

Contemporary thought in astronomy and cosmology says that stars start life as clouds of dust in the vast emptiness of space.  These clouds are compressed through collisions or by blast waves from supernovae and may eventually condense into one or more stars.  Stars then go through a multi-billion year lifecycle:

Most stars, including the sun, are “main sequence stars,” fueled by nuclear fusion converting hydrogen into helium. For these stars, the hotter they are, the brighter. These stars are in the most stable part of their existence; this stage generally lasts for about 5 billion years.

As stars begin to die, they become giants and supergiants (above the main sequence). These stars have depleted their hydrogen supply and are very old. The core contracts as the outer layers expand. These stars will eventually explode (becoming a planetary nebula or supernova, depending on their mass) and then become white dwarfs, neutron stars, or black holes (again depending on their mass ).

Smaller stars (like our Sun) eventually become faint white dwarfs (hot, white, dim stars) that are below the main sequence. These hot, shrinking stars have depleted their nuclear fuels and will eventually become cold, dark, black dwarfs.

HR diagram [This obviously presupposes that God is nowhere in sight, and has no hand in stellar creative activities.]  So color and luminosity are generally linked to a star’s temperature, as shown in the “H-R Diagram” to right.  Or so most astronomers believe. 

Since the color of a heated body depends on temperature, the different classes take on different, though subtle, colors, from slightly reddish for class M to orange for K, through yellow- white to bluish for classes B and O. Star colors can be noted rather easily even with the unaided eye, especially when those close together contrast against each other. Stars of classes L and T, none of which are visible to the naked eye, range from red through deep red to “infrared” (these optically invisible under any circumstances).

Not necessarily so, some would argue.

There are a group of astronomers, astrophysicists and cosmologists who hold to the Electric Universe theory, which contends that electrical charges acting in space offer a better explanation for ‘The Way Things Are’ in space.

There are stars that violate the standard model of stellar evolution. Stars that are too cool and too small for atomic fusion to take place in their cores have caused astronomical researchers to scramble for explanations. Since stars are supposed to have a mass of at least 75 times that of Jupiter for fusion reactions to occur, another speculative mechanism for what powers them has been suggested: gravitational collapse. In other words, gravity is pulling the cold, dark star into greater compaction, which must be what is creating the additional heat and x-ray emissions.

“In the ES [Electric Star] model, perhaps the most important factor in determining any given star’s characteristics is the strength of the current density in Amperes per square meter (A/m2) measured at that star’s surface. If a star’s incoming current density increases, the arc discharges on its surface (photospheric tufts) will get hotter, change color (away from red, toward blue), and get brighter. The absolute brightness of a star, therefore, depends on two things: the strength of the current density impinging into its surface, and the star’s size (the star’s diameter). Therefore, we add another scale to the horizontal axis of the HR diagram: Current Density at the Star’s Surface.”

The really interesting bit is that NASA and the established space community want nothing to do with such a view of the cosmos.  That’s not surprising, because the folks at Thunderbolts , one of the primary Electric Universe web sites, describe their theory this way:

Electric Universe [challenges] “the myths of ‘Big Bang’ cosmology, and does so without resorting to black holes, dark matter, dark energy, neutron stars, magnetic ‘reconnection,’ or any other fictions needed to prop up a failed theory.

To NASA and much of academia, such a view seems to be as dangerous an idea as a loving God who “determines the number of the stars and calls them each by name.”

The earth, the stars and all of Creation provide a general revelation of the nature and hand of God.  The more we learn in any field of scientific observation, the more we see His hand in everything.  We can argue about the specifics of the pieces, and how they all fit together, but we can’t escape the growing evidence that the hand of God was and is behind it all.

“You alone are the LORD. You made the heavens, even the highest heavens, and all their starry host, the earth and all that is on it, the seas and all that is in them. You give life to everything, and the multitudes of heaven worship you.”  ( Nehemiah 9:6, NIV )

Tags: , , , ,


Mar 17 2008

The Heavens Declare

Tag: faith, science, spaceSteve @ 14:51 pm

NGC-6357_Pismis24 As a long-time space geek, I have always been amazed by the beauty and majesty of the heavens.  The Hubble Space Telescope and other space media sources pour forth incredible image after incredible image.  But that’s not the only thing that pours forth.  Psalm 19 says this:

“The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they display knowledge. There is no speech or language where their voice is not heard. Their voice goes out into all the earth, their words to the ends of the world. In the heavens he has pitched a tent for the sun.”  ( Psalm 19:1-4a, NIV )

Everything that is seen and unseen reveals the hand of God.  All you have to do is look up.  Then again, even if you want to put your head in the sand, you’ll find Him there, too.

With that in mind, I’ve added a page dedicated to the hand of God as revealed in space imagery .

Tags: , , , , ,


Mar 10 2008

I Surrender All

Tag: faith, scienceSteve @ 09:53 am

That’s it.  I quit.  I give in.  Yesterday the pastor preached through the science portion of Focus on the Family’s Truth Project , and hammered those who, like me, hold to an old-earth creation view. 

I’ve got no beef with the Truth Project.  It’s a DVD-based small group series that provides a Scripture-based response to the secular worldviews.  Overall, it’s a well-produced survey of the issues of truth, theology (who is God?), anthropology (who is man?) and a number of other cultural topics.  Even the science portion is well-balanced, focusing primarily on evolution vs creation issues.  I would recommend the series to anyone looking for a solid small-group curriculum.

To his credit, the pastor pulled me aside before the service and warned me that he would be covering the material from a young earth view.  Overall, I have no beef with young-earth creationists, so long as they recognize that their view is one of many, and that holding something other than a young-earth view does not invalidate one’s salvation.  Unfortunately, that seems to be the direction many YECers want to take it.  I heard yesterday, and I’ve heard it many times before, the implication that “if old-earth creationists don’t trust Genesis, then they don’t trust the rest of Scripture.”

Horse hockey.  I trust every word of Genesis, and the rest of Scripture to boot.  I just don’t hold to that particular interpretation of the Creation account. 

My spousal unit is the lone Protestant in Catholic Bible study.  She has frequently been told that Protestants are ‘incomplete’ Christians.  That’s what I’m taking from the young-earth crowd, as well - old-earth creationists ‘are still Christians, but….’ 

That’s a big but.

Here’s the question: how do I respond?  In every other respect, I am in complete agreement with the pastor’s teaching.  Do I suck it up and seek to respond in grace, knowing that I’m viewed as a tainted Christian?  Walk off in a huff?

Tags: , , , ,


Mar 03 2008

Mom! The Horta’s Back!

Tag: miscellaneous, scienceSteve @ 11:54 am

…and it’s still mad!  (ORA)

Lava flow at Royal Gardens

lava flow

Go to the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory for more pics and lava flow maps.

Tags: , , ,


Feb 26 2008

Not That this Comes as a Surprise…

Tag: global whining, scienceSteve @ 09:46 am

More evidence. Global whining. It’s cold outside. Yawn.

Forget global warming: Welcome to the new Ice Age

Snow cover over North America and much of Siberia, Mongolia and China is greater than at any time since 1966.

The U.S. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) reported that many American cities and towns suffered record cold temperatures in January and early February. According to the NCDC, the average temperature in January “was -0.3 F cooler than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average.”

China is surviving its most brutal winter in a century. Temperatures in the normally balmy south were so low for so long that some middle-sized cities went days and even weeks without electricity because once power lines had toppled it was too cold or too icy to repair them.

There have been so many snow and ice storms in Ontario and Quebec in the past two months that the real estate market has felt the pinch as home buyers have stayed home rather than venturing out looking for new houses.

In just the first two weeks of February, Toronto received 70 cm of snow, smashing the record of 66.6 cm for the entire month set back in the pre-SUV, pre-Kyoto, pre-carbon footprint days of 1950.

And remember the Arctic Sea ice? The ice we were told so hysterically last fall had melted to its “lowest levels on record? Never mind that those records only date back as far as 1972 and that there is anthropological and geological evidence of much greater melts in the past.

The ice is back.

Gilles Langis, a senior forecaster with the Canadian Ice Service in Ottawa, says the Arctic winter has been so severe the ice has not only recovered, it is actually 10 to 20 cm thicker in many places than at this time last year.

Tags:


Feb 21 2008

What’s On - Or Under - Your Plate?

Tag: faith, scienceSteve @ 09:17 am

I’m continually amazed at how far people will go not to recognize the hand of God.  The title of this piece from Discovery News pretty well describes the secular view of creation - it’s all just random, ‘lucky’ accidents that gave us a habitable planet.

click image for more detail Plate Tectonics: Earth’s Lucky Geology

Jan. 11, 2008 — Four decades after the rise of the great, unifying theory of plate tectonics, geologists are still scratching their heads over a lot of the details.

Unanswered, for instance, are basic questions like how the shifting and colliding of plates got started, what keeps plates moving, why other planets in our solar system lack plate tectonics, and how important all the geological turmoil might be to the evolution of life.

“We didn’t get it all right the first time, so let’s ask the questions,” said geologist Vicki Hansen of the University of Minnesota at Duluth, referring to the fact that despite decades of work, many mysteries remain.

Hansen recently stirred the pot with a controversial hypothesis published in last month’s issue of the journal Geology . Meteorite impacts early in Earth’s history, she suggested, created the first rifts in the crust, jump-starting plate tectonics.

Prior to the 1960s, geologists were hard pressed to explain such basic things as how most mountain ranges formed and why volcanic regions and earthquakes were clustered in certain parts of the planet. Plate tectonics put these phenomena, and many others, into a single, unified framework.

That framework is an Earth with a rocky crust divided into plates that are moving, rifting, colliding and overrunning each other. It finally made sense of a previously nonsensical geography and is now recognized as one of the greatest scientific breakthroughs of the 20th century.

Hugh Ross from Reasons.org understands that it’s no accident, and that plate tectonics is a necessary part of God’s Creation if we are to have a stable, habitable planet.

Two known mechanisms were involved in the delicate process of gradually removing greenhouse gases from Earth’s atmosphere as the ancient Sun brightened: (1) a continuous supply of exposed-to-the-atmosphere silicates (compounds containing silicon, oxygen, and metals that comprise more than 90% of Earth’s continental crust); and (2) a continuous burial of carbon-rich organic matter.

In the presence of liquid water, silicates gobble up (chemically react with) carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, forming carbonates and sand in the process. (See figure.) Bringing these silicates into contact with the atmosphere, where they can do their part in carbon dioxide reduction, requires a balanced cycle of crustal uplift and erosion. First, efficient plate tectonics must help create silicates, then push them above the ocean forming islands and continental land masses. Then, erosion must “plough” the crust so that more silicates are constantly brought into contact with the atmosphere.

This sounds like ‘intelligent design,’ but Ross is not a fan of ID as advocated by William Dembski and the Uncommon Descent crowd, because Dembski argues for a generic cause behind ID without explicitly stating that God is that cause.  Ross makes no bones about God being the Creator.

Tags: , , , , ,


Next Page »